Skip to content
Irish Language Rights|Cearta Teanga don Ghaeilge

Committee on the Administration of Justice
An Coiste um Riarachán Dlí agus Cirt

  • View our YouTube channel
  • View our Twitter account
  • Donate
  • Events
  • Contact
  • About Us
    • History & Purpose
    • Structure & Staff
    • Why Human Rights?
  • Our Work
    • Overview
      • Democratic Governance
      • Policing and Justice
      • Legacy of the Past
      • Confronting Prejudice
      • Immigration
      • Increased Equality
    • Solidarity
      • Equality Coalition
      • Model Bill Team
      • International Solidarity
  • Get Involved
    • How to Get Involved
    • Donate
    • Become a Member
    • Volunteer
  • Publications
    • All Publications
    • Submissions & Briefings
    • Reports
    • Annual Reports
    • Our Newsletter
  • Latest
    • All Updates
    • Press Releases
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Podcasts & Videos
    • News
    • Events
  • About Us
    • History & Purpose
    • Structure & Staff
    • Why Human Rights?
  • Our Work
    • Overview
      • Democratic Governance
      • Policing and Justice
      • Legacy of the Past
      • Confronting Prejudice
      • Immigration
      • Increased Equality
    • Solidarity
      • Equality Coalition
      • Model Bill Team
      • International Solidarity
  • Get Involved
    • How to Get Involved
    • Donate
    • Become a Member
    • Volunteer
  • Publications
    • All Publications
    • Submissions & Briefings
    • Reports
    • Annual Reports
    • Our Newsletter
  • Latest
    • All Updates
    • Press Releases
    • Opinion & Analysis
    • Podcasts & Videos
    • News
    • Events
  • Donate
  • Events
  • Contact
  • View our YouTube channel
  • View our Twitter account
Cearta Teanga don Ghaeilge
Irish Language Rights
Press Releases

European Court of Human Rights Ireland V UK Judgment March 2018

March 20, 2018
Policy Area(s):Legacy of the Past
Keywords:Impunity

Responding to today’s Ireland V UK judgment, CAJ Director Brian Gormally says:

“This is a narrow and largely technical decision by the European Court of Human Rights. It considered that the new evidence was not sufficient to show that, had it been taken into account by the original court, it would have been decisive in changing the original judgment. This is hugely disappointing in that it leaves the unjustified distinction between “torture” and “inhuman and degrading treatment” intact in this instance. However, we should remember that the Article 3 prohibition on all such treatment, whatever the definition, is absolute. Those who have sought to justify brutal interrogation methods on the basis of the 1978 judgment are still wrong in law and barbaric in their practice.”

The full judgment can be found online HERE

Share this:

All updates
FIDH Membership logo Equality Coalition logo
Contact Us

CAJ, Community House
Citylink Business Park
6A Albert Street, Belfast
BT12 4HQ

Company limited by guarantee.
Registration No. NI032591

 

Tel: +44 (0)28 9031 6000

Email: info@caj.org.uk

  • View our YouTube channel
  • View our Twitter account
Our ezine
CAJ publishes a regular ezine, Just Updates, to keep everyone up to date on our work. Register below to receive future issues! If you have previously registered for Just Updates and aren't sure if you are receiving the ezine yet, please check your junk folder for emails from info@caj.org.uk.
© COPYRIGHT 2025. Website by Bag of Bees Studio
Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Hit enter to search or ESC to close